From cf9f783d264bbf3e883cd1e80b71878d6b1a78b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jordi Mallach Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:33:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Faq fixes. git-svn-id: svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/nano/trunk/nano@949 35c25a1d-7b9e-4130-9fde-d3aeb78583b8 --- ChangeLog | 3 +++ faq.html | 17 +++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 9eab7494..bc9d63dc 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ CVS code - - gettextized a pair of strings. - m4/gettext.m4: - Back down to 1.1.3 version. +- faq.html: + - Various link updates and other fixes (Aaron S. Hawley). + - Typo fixes (David Lawrence Ramsey). - po/sv.po: - Swedish translation update (Christian Rose). - po/ru.po: diff --git a/faq.html b/faq.html index b68c5d78..cf2a28e8 100644 --- a/faq.html +++ b/faq.html @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ packages. RPM or DEB package?
3.2. Compiling from source: WHAT THE HECK DO I DO NOW? -
3.3. Why does everything go into +
3.3. Why does everything go into /usr/local?
3.4. I get errors about 'bindtextdomain', 'gettext' and/or 'gettextdomain'.  What can I do about it? @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ nano instead of Pico?

6.2. Why should I use Pico instead of nano?
6.3. What is so bad about the -PINE license? +Pine license?
6.4. Okay, well what mail program should I use then?
6.5. Why doesn't UW simply change @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ it is useful enough it will be included in future versions. 1.3. What is GNU nano?
GNU Nano is designed to be a free -replacement for the Pico text editor, part of the PINE email suite from The University of Washington.  It aims to "emulate Pico as closely as possible and perhaps include extra functionality.
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ nano was developed). of nano?
The current version of nano *should* -be 1.1.4.  Of course you should always check the nano hompage to +be 1.1.4.  Of course you should always check the nano homepage to see what the latest and greatest version is.

@@ -252,10 +252,10 @@ packages.

at: @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ mailer integration with Pine), nano is the way to go.

-6.3. What is so bad about the PINE +6.3. What is so bad about the Pine license?

The U of W license for Pine and @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ both, i.e. distribute modified binaries.
should I use then?
If you are looking to use a Free -Software program similar to PINE and emacs is not your thing, you should +Software program similar to Pine and emacs is not your thing, you should definitely take a look at mutt.  It is a full-screen, console based mail program that actually has a lot more flexibility than Pine, but has a keymap included in the distribution that @@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ and you should know the answer.
8. ChangeLog +
2001/12/26 - Misc. fixes (Aaron S. Hawley, DLR).
2001/10/02 - Update for Free Translation Project.
2001/10/02 - Assorted fixes, Debian additions.
2001/06/30 - Silly typo fix.
-- 2.39.5