RPM or DEB package?</a></font>
<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#3.2">3.2. Compiling from source: WHAT
THE HECK DO I DO NOW?</a></font>
-<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#3.2">3.3. Why does everything go into
+<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#3.3">3.3. Why does everything go into
/usr/local?</a></font>
<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#3.4">3.4. I get errors about 'bindtextdomain',
'gettext' and/or 'gettextdomain'. What can I do about it?</a></font>
<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#6.2">6.2. Why should I use Pico instead
of nano?</a></font>
<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#6.3">6.3. What is so bad about the
-PINE license?</a></font>
+Pine license?</a></font>
<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#6.4">6.4. Okay, well what mail program
should I use then?</a></font>
<br><font color="#330000"><a href="#6.5">6.5. Why doesn't UW simply change
<a NAME="1.3"></a><font color="#330000">1.3. What is GNU nano?</font></h2>
<blockquote><font color="#330000">GNU Nano is designed to be a free
-replacement for the Pico text editor, part of the PINE email suite from <a
+replacement for the Pico text editor, part of the Pine email suite from <a
href="http://www.washington.edu/pine">The University of
Washington</a>. It aims to "emulate Pico as closely as possible and
perhaps include extra functionality.</font></blockquote>
of nano?</font></h2>
<blockquote><font color="#330000">The current version of nano *should*
-be 1.1.4. Of course you should always check the nano hompage to
+be 1.1.4. Of course you should always check the nano homepage to
see what the latest and greatest version is.</font></blockquote>
<h2>
at:</font>
<ul>
<li>
-<font color="#330000"><a href="http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386">http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386</a></font></li>
+<font color="#330000"><a href="http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386">http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386</a></font></li>
<li>
-<font color="#330000"><a href="ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386">ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386</a></font></li>
+<font color="#330000"><a href="ftp://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386">ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/distributions/redhat/contrib/libc6/i386</a></font></li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<h2>
-<a NAME="6.3"></a><font color="#330000">6.3. What is so bad about the PINE
+<a NAME="6.3"></a><font color="#330000">6.3. What is so bad about the Pine
license?</font></h2>
<blockquote><font color="#330000">The U of W license for Pine and
should I use then?</font></h2>
<blockquote><font color="#330000"> If you are looking to use a Free
-Software program similar to PINE and emacs is not your thing, you should
+Software program similar to Pine and emacs is not your thing, you should
definitely take a look at <a href="http://www.mutt.org">mutt</a>. It
is a full-screen, console based mail program that actually has a lot more
flexibility than Pine, but has a keymap included in the distribution that
<a NAME="8"></a><font color="#330000">8. ChangeLog</font>
</h2>
+<blockquote>2001/12/26 - Misc. fixes (Aaron S. Hawley, DLR).</blockquote>
<blockquote>2001/10/02 - Update for Free Translation Project.</blockquote>
<blockquote>2001/10/02 - Assorted fixes, Debian additions.</blockquote>
<blockquote>2001/06/30 - Silly typo fix.</blockquote>